:format(webp))
Why People Leave
And How Cash Lets Them Stay
Sandino ScheideggerTradotto daInglese
In a recent interview, ETH Zurich researcher Jan Freihardt challenged a familiar narrative: that people in the Global South are fleeing their homes en masse toward the Global North due to climate change. It’s an interesting perspective—and one that made me pause.
Queste fonti offrono contesto e informazioni
)
di Manuel Stark (NZZ am Sonntag) il dicembre 24, 2024
Let’s start with Freihardt’s four key points:
Most people stay put, even when conditions worsen. And when they do move, they usually stay close to home.
Social ties and local identity are strong reasons to stay rooted.
Long-distance migration (especially to the Global North) is out of financial reach for most. It’s simply too expensive.
What we often call “climate migration” is more accurately economic migration. It’s deepening inequality —not the climate event itself — that pushes people to leave.
Freihardt makes an uncomfortable but important point: if we want fewer people to migrate, we need to make staying a viable option. And that starts with reducing inequality.
While reading, I couldn’t help but think of direct cash transfers. Social Income doesn’t exist to prevent migration — but it does exist to support people where they are, and that mission has ripple effects.
By putting money directly into the hands of those in vulnerable areas, we help stabilize lives before displacement becomes inevitable. Cash enables people to stay: not because they’re stuck, but because they have a real choice.
Direct cash transfers are more than poverty relief. They’re a climate adaptation tool. They help people rebuild after disasters, invest in resilience, or simply get by. And they reinforce Freihardt’s insight: people deeply want to stay connected to their communities — even in crisis. Often, they do stay. But only when they can.
Migration is complex. But at its core, it’s usually about one thing: the pursuit of a better life. If we’re serious about tackling the root causes of displacement, then direct cash transfers are one of the smartest, most humane strategies we’ve got. They let people act before they’re forced to move.
Wouldn’t you stay, too, if you had the means to rebuild?
Sandino ScheideggerContinua a leggere
:format(webp))
They'll Just Spend it on Booze
Sandino ScheideggerThirty studies across three continents looked at what happens when poor families receive cash. The myth that they spend it on booze did not survive a single one of these studies.
:format(webp))
I microcrediti sembrano un’idea fantastica. Allora perché non li offriamo?
Sandino ScheideggerI microcrediti dovrebbero combattere la povertà. Per i più poveri, però, spesso creano più pressione che opportunità.
:format(webp))
Statistiche sulla povertà nel mondo 2024
Matthew RobertsI trasferimenti monetari diretti riducono le disuguaglianze di reddito sostenendo chi ne ha più bisogno.